Experimental Breeder Reactor I, Mark III
1958 film, with transcript
Catalog description: This film presents some major aspects of the fabrication, installation and operation of a new core (Mark III) for the Experimental Breeder Reactor I.
This is film 88388 in our catalog.
Show transcript
| 00:30 | Argonne National Laboratory's Idaho Division, |
| 00:41 | located at the National Reactor Testing Station, |
| 00:44 | operates the experimental breeder Reactor 1. |
| 00:49 | Experience gained since 1951 in the operation of this reactor |
| 00:54 | forms the foundation for fast power reactor development. |
| 00:58 | This is the first reactor to employ sodium-potassium alloy as a coolant |
| 01:02 | and to utilize the direct current electromagnetic pump. |
| 01:06 | During this time, the reactor performed satisfactorily as a steady power source, |
| 01:11 | demonstrated the breeding concept, generated the world's first electricity from nuclear power, |
| 01:15 | and served its primary function in providing fundamental fast reactor information. |
| 01:21 | When EBR-1 was operated at power-to-flow ratios one and one-half times, |
| 01:27 | the design ratio, some undesirable dynamic characteristics were observed. These were |
| 01:33 | a prompt positive temperature coefficient and a tendency toward spontaneous oscillation |
| 01:38 | of power. It was believed these characteristics were related and that the cause of the prompt |
| 01:43 | positive temperature coefficient was either the Doppler effect, which increases the effective |
| 01:48 | fissioning cross-section due to heating enriched uranium, or to mechanical motion of the fuel |
| 01:53 | elements. Enriched uranium in the form of the helix was prepared for measurement of the Doppler |
| 01:59 | effect in fast reactors. This experiment was performed in the laboratory's critical assembly |
| 02:07 | facility, ZPR-3. The helical form was adopted to minimize motion due to heating, which could |
| 02:15 | produce undesirable side reactivity effects. Positioned within an assembled EBR-1 core |
| 02:22 | mock-up the helix was periodically heated then cooled on a 20 second cycle time |
| 02:30 | careful measurement of the power oscillations resulting from the cycling |
| 02:34 | made it fairly certain the doppler effect was much too small |
| 02:37 | to have been the primary cause of the prompt temperature coefficient observed in the reactor |
| 02:44 | concluding that the primary problem was mechanical motion it was decided to investigate ebr1 |
| 02:49 | performance as part of an overall program to study reactor dynamics. |
| 02:56 | A rigid core assembly to restrict mechanical motion was designed for EBR-1. |
| 03:03 | Designated Mark III, the core structure consisting of laminated steel disks was machined and |
| 03:09 | assembled by the laboratory's central shops. |
| 03:14 | The inside hexagonal surface fits the outer perimeter of the blanket sub-assemblies. |
| 03:20 | These discs are held and aligned with tie rods. |
| 03:26 | Paralleling the assembly of the core structure, fabrication of Mark III fuel was underway by the metallurgy division. |
| 03:33 | The fuel for the Mark III core is uranium enriched to 93%. |
| 03:38 | The blanket is normal uranium. |
| 03:41 | Both blanket and core uranium are alloyed with 2 weight percent zirconium. |
| 03:46 | Clad with zircaloy 2, they are co-extruded into the form of a rod. |
| 03:52 | The rough cores for the blanket extrusion billets are produced by casting in a multi-cavity |
| 03:56 | graphite mold. |
| 04:00 | The enriched uranium is melted in a 5-kilogram batch and cast in a single-cavity mold. |
| 04:08 | A graphite crucible, coated with ceramic wash, is charged with the uranium biscuit and zirconium |
| 04:13 | sponge for the blanket alloy. |
| 04:16 | Melting and alloying is done by induction heating in a vacuum of ten |
| 04:20 | microns or less. After alloying the metal is bottom poured into the mold by |
| 04:29 | lifting a stopper rod. These castings after machining are tested for |
| 04:39 | homogeneity by a non-destructive method. A sound transmission principle is |
| 04:44 | utilized. Five mega cycle ultrasonic waves are generated by means of a quartz |
| 04:49 | transducer and sent through the metal. The quality of the casting is |
| 04:55 | graphically recorded on a strip of electrosensitive paper. The casting, after |
| 05:04 | further machining, yields two extrusion billet cores. These cores, assembled with |
| 05:09 | copper nickel end plugs are encased in a sleeve of Zercaloy II. A copper jacket is added to |
| 05:18 | prevent contamination of the billet components during heating and to provide lubrication |
| 05:23 | during extrusion. Closed by Heliarc welding, the assembled billet is then evacuated, outgassed |
| 05:38 | and sealed. |
| 05:43 | The billets are co-extruded by nuclear metals incorporated to rods of one-half inch diameter. |
| 05:49 | Upon return, they are inspected, pickled to remove the copper, and swaged to a specified |
| 05:55 | diameter. |
| 05:59 | Heat treated for stabilization, the rods are cut to appropriate fuel and blanket lengths, |
| 06:04 | and the cladding thickness measured. |
| 06:07 | To join the sections of either type rod, a commercial glass lathe was specifically adapted |
| 06:12 | at Argonne for tungsten arc butt welding. |
| 06:16 | This welding operation is extremely precise because of the difficulty of fusing the high |
| 06:20 | melting zircaloy without excessive melting of the uranium. |
| 06:29 | A 10-mil zirconium spacer disc separates the enriched and blanket sections on each fuel rod. |
| 06:43 | Chill and gas retainers surround the electrode and weld area. |
| 06:48 | Welding is purposely limited to the 20-mil zircaloy cladding and is made in a double pass, |
| 06:54 | each pass requiring a different welding current. |
| 06:59 | A section bond is made at each weld by fusing the metal in a small zone to add mechanical |
| 07:08 | strength. |
| 07:18 | The cladding is protected against oxidation by passing a stream of helium through the |
| 07:22 | Vicor II. |
| 07:29 | After heat treatment, cladding thickness is measured by an eddy-current method. |
| 07:34 | Eddy currents are induced in the Zircaloy cladding by means of a point probe. |
| 07:38 | The apparent impedance of the probe is influenced by the cladding thickness. |
| 07:46 | The bond on the rods is then scanned by the ultrasonic transmission technique. |
| 07:53 | testing methods help to ensure the quality of the completed fuel and blanket rods. |
| 08:03 | Zirconium ribs are spot welded to rods ground to their finished diameter. |
| 08:08 | These will provide accurate spacing of the tightly clustered rods in their final geometry. |
| 08:17 | The welding operation is performed automatically on a specially designed |
| 08:20 | condenser discharge type spot welder. Welds are placed at one quarter inch intervals along each |
| 08:26 | of the three ribs, a total of 240 welds per rod. Machining operations complete the fuel and blanket |
| 08:35 | rod fabrication. The completed core structure ready for installation in the reactor tank |
| 08:45 | has a total height of nine feet and five inches. |
| 08:50 | The reduced diameter at the bottom will receive the core and inner blanket rods. |
| 08:56 | The structure rests on this shoulder with the inlet plenum chamber located just above the upper blanket. |
| 09:02 | This plenum chamber contains four two-way inlet valves for switching from series to parallel flow. |
| 09:09 | The up position of the valves permits series flow through the inner blanket and core, |
| 09:14 | while the down position allows parallel flow. |
| 09:16 | The plate above the inlet plenum chamber has seal rings to prevent bypass leakage between the inlet and outlet plenum chambers. |
| 09:26 | This seal plate also contains two flow control valves for throttling the exit flow from the inner blanket under parallel flow conditions. |
| 09:35 | Under series flow conditions, these valves are closed. |
| 09:38 | Additional rigidity is obtained by an arrangement of clamps around fuel and blanket sub-assemblies |
| 09:48 | at the core center line and at the seal plate. |
| 10:04 | The upper part of the structure is primarily shielding with an overflow plenum chamber |
| 10:07 | near the top. |
| 10:10 | The top plate holds the actuators and position indicators for the various valves and clamps |
| 10:15 | in the structure. |
| 10:23 | The core structure is installed in the same reactor tank that housed the EBR-1, Mark I |
| 10:28 | Mk. II cores. Fuel and blanket rods, with their attached extensions for handling, are |
| 10:41 | positioned within a hexagonal can. Complete sub-assemblies within the hex can contain |
| 10:55 | 36 rods, and depending upon location within the structure, |
| 10:59 | will consist of fuel and or blanket material. |
| 11:05 | A tightening rod is located at the center of each sub-assembly |
| 11:09 | and, when expanded, provides additional rigidity. |
| 11:16 | The thorough temperature instrumentation of Mark III |
| 11:19 | includes thermocouples in the plenum chamber structure, |
| 11:23 | fuel rods, blanket rods, and coolant passages. |
| 11:29 | The complete Mark III loading contains 19 sub-assemblies. |
| 11:33 | Seven enriched sub-assemblies comprise the core. |
| 11:37 | These are surrounded by a ring of 12 inner blanket sub-assemblies. |
| 11:45 | Criticality was achieved on November 11, 1957. |
| 11:49 | It was determined to be 47 and 4 tenths kilograms of uranium-235, |
| 11:56 | within 2% of the critical mass determined from the mock-up of the core |
| 12:00 | on the zero-power reactor 3. |
| 12:05 | Operating test data indicates that Mark 3 would be stable |
| 12:08 | at several times design power, and the instability apparent in Mark 2 was due to mechanical design |
| 12:15 | and is not inherent in fast reactors. |
| 12:20 | This investigation of reactor dynamics is continuing |
| 12:23 | and will establish parameters affecting the stability of fast reactors. |